抳e
          already stated the obvious. Those so-called sun-sign 揾oroscopes?
          in the newspapers and magazines are junk and totally worthless for
          guidance. They should come with a warning label telling people that
          they are not real astrology.
          
          
        The
          computerized horoscopes go further. They tell you what the rest of the
          planets are doing in your horoscope, but that is still no where near
          enough. If you bought a new car and all they delivered to you were a
          bunch of parts, would you have a useable car? Of course not. You
          can't drive disconnected parts. They have to be put together. It's
          the same situation with those computerized horoscopes. 
          
          
          The
          description of each planetary position that you find in the books is
          general and designed to cover all the possible things that the planet
          can do in any situation. All of those statements won't apply to a
          particular individual horoscope. Not only that, but some of the interpretations
          in those computerized 搑eadings?will contradict each other.
          During a real reading, the astrologer has to weigh each factor against
          the others and see which ones are going to predominate. The statements
          that don't apply, drop out. The true statements remain. That's
          what this second section is about: how to put it all together and see
          the person in the horoscope.
          
          
          Remember
          the case I talked about earlier, the one where the person had a strong
          Mars (action, energy, assertiveness, aggression) and yet was very
          passive? This was because the planet Neptune was placed in an even
          stronger position. What made Neptune 搒tronger?than Mars in this
          case? What are the rules to follow? 
          That's what the next few chapters will tell you. 
          
          
          One
          important point. Not every horoscope has a strongest planet, but the
          ones that do are much easier to interpret. Find that strongest planet
          and you can easily make true specific descriptive statements about
          that person. Not just 揃arnum?statements that can apply to anyone
          (搒ometimes, you have trouble with relationships? wow, how
          unique). For instance, you should be able to detect if a person has a
          repressed temper that can flare up suddenly into an angry rage. If one
          therapist had that information years ago, he would have taken the
          violent fantasies of one patient seriously and several innocent people
          might still be alive today. I am referring to the horoscope of Charles
          Whitman Jr., the 揟exas Tower Killer? A short time before Whitman
          snapped, he went to see a therapist, and told of his urge to go to the
          top of the tower with a deer rifle and start shooting. The danger was
          clearly indicated in Whitman's horoscope, as you will see.
          
          
          We
          will start with recognizing chart shapes and then go to what I call
          揂strology by Counting? If you can recognize certain patterns and
          can count how many planets are in a particular place, you are well on
          your way to being able to interpret a horoscope. The fist two types of
          chart shapes, the funnel and the locomotive, make a good test because
          the important points about a person's life seem to jump out at you.
          Keep an accurate record of your 揾its?and 搈isses? Then make
          up your own mind if astrology is just a 搒uperstition?or a real
          force in our lives.
           
           
          back to top